Page 4 - AAPT August 19
P. 4

Cover Story
       LIVE,VIRTUAL






       AND CONSTRUCTIVE






       TRAINING







       Chip Gilkison,                       threats from all areas of the globe, pilots   to a situation where pilots cannot make
       Director, Business Development,      must be able to immerse themselves in   use of the full capability of the aircraft
       Live/Blended Test & Training         a training environment that can more   in an efficient manner, compromising
       Collins Aerospace                    easily  replicate  real  world  threats.   mission  effectiveness.  One  concept
                                            However,  the  requirement  of  pilots   for  F-35  training  is  to  employ  a  “big
       Militaries around the world predominantly                                shed” model whereby participants are
       train their fighter pilots with live flight   being located at a specific geographic   required to operate at the same, albeit
       exercises  in  order  to  be  ready  for   location  like  a  training  range  is  very   high, security level; however, this limits
       combat  when  their  country  or Allies   costly and takes a lot of time; time that   the ability to train with other platforms
       call.  As you take delivery of your 5th   they may not necessarily have.  and  partners  operating  at  a  lower
       generation fighter like the F-35, many   Cost prohibitive:               security level thereby diminishes the
       challenges exist with that approach that                                 overall training value.
       may preclude your pilots from training in   Flight  hour  costs  vary  from  $7,500-  To  overcome  training  shortfalls,
       the most realistic manner possible and   $50,000 for a given airframe. In order   Live, Virtual and Constructive (LVC)
       becoming proficient in all the aircraft's   to properly train our pilots, they must   enabled systems may be utilized in a
       capabilities, not just those in which "live"   engage  with  "red"  aggressor  aircraft   secure and dynamic environment. LVC
       training adversaries are available.  that emulate the enemy. Many times,
                                            training missions are conducted within   is  not  a  new  concept  however  there
       5th generation aircraft cannot       a single training squadron where aircraft   has been a slow uptake due to concept
       train like they fight:               of  the  same  type  train  against  each   of  employment  and  technological
                                                                                challenges.  Given  the  world  class
       If an F-35 were to attempt to train with   other. To fly a 2 vs. 2, air-to-air training   ranges available across Australia plus
                                            mission, four aircraft must be employed,
       any other aircraft besides another F-35   costing anywhere from $45,000 to over   significant investment in cutting edge
       from the same country, the other aircraft   $200,000 for 5th gen platforms. Not only   simulation architectures via JP9711, the
       would  be  blind  from  any  simulated   is this training cost prohibitive, it's not   potential for LVC is very exciting. New
       weapon  shots  and  absent  from  real   realistic. In a real operational mission,   systems must easily interoperate with
       time  notifications,  enabling  negative   friendly forces will combat enemies that   existing systems in order to maximize
       training to continue. Other aircraft do   are not of the same aircraft type as their   investments. Standards such as TENA,
       not have the security protocols onboard   own. In a training mission, we must be   HLA  and  DIS  must  be  employed  to
       required to share the same data as an   able to replicate the same operational   ensure  interoperability  is  possible
       F-35. For now, the F-35 is limited to   scenario as close as possible so that our   instead of empty promises. Any attempt
       training in multi-ship events with either   warfighters can train like they fight. In an   to delay the transition of training in a
       like  F-35s  or  with  other  aircraft,  but   age where affordability is close behind   more  secure  environment  in  anyway
       only via relayed voice call to emulate   readiness, we cannot continue to train   other than the most realistic scenarios
       weapon releases.                     in this manner. We must make better   possible  will  only  lead  to  continued

       Rapidly emerging threats:            use of the flight hours we do have. To do   training shortfalls.
                                                                                   Collins’ Joint Secure Air Combat
                                            this, Air Combat Training must evolve.
       In 2003, pilots needed to be proficient   Australia has specific challenges in   Training System (JSAS) was the first
       in less than five weapon systems on   that the procurement of the F-35 fifth   to demonstrate an LVC training exercise
       their own fighter. Today's 5th generation   generation  platform  could  result  in  a   with  certified  Multiple  Independent
       fighter has more than four times that, but   training shortfall where users cannot   Levels of Security (MILS) encryption in
       flight hour budgets are not increasing.   train as they would fight due to security   both the airborne and ground systems
       In order to meet the rapidly emerging   protocols. This training shortfall will lead   with  over  32  digital  channels.  For


       4
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9